Bybit is changing course after getting hit hard earlier this year. The crypto exchange is teaming up with Zodia Custody to offer a new layer of protection for institutional users, letting them trade while keeping their assets off the exchange itself.
The move comes in response to a headline-grabbing $1.45 billion hack in February — one of the biggest in crypto history. This new partnership could change how exchanges handle user funds, especially as concerns over security keep growing.
$1.45 Billion Gone in a Flash
In February 2025, Bybit was rocked by a cyberattack that stripped the exchange of nearly $1.5 billion in Ethereum.
It wasn’t just any hack. The FBI later confirmed the culprits were the Lazarus Group — the North Korean hacking syndicate notorious for high-profile crypto heists.
It exposed major weaknesses not just in Bybit, but across the industry. Investors panicked. Questions flooded in. Where was the money stored? Why wasn’t it more secure?
A Safer Setup: Segregated Holdings
The new collaboration with Zodia Custody answers some of those questions.
Zodia, backed by financial giants like Standard Chartered, SBI Holdings, and Northern Trust, doesn’t operate like your typical crypto wallet. It keeps assets segregated, meaning your funds don’t get pooled with anyone else’s.
This setup is a big deal for a few reasons:
-
If a hacker gets in, it’s much harder to loot everything at once.
-
Funds are less vulnerable to mismanagement or internal fraud.
-
Customers keep more control over their own assets.
And yes, that’s a far cry from how most crypto exchanges work today.
Off-Exchange, But Still Trading
Here’s where things get interesting: users can still trade on Bybit without moving their funds directly onto the exchange.
Instead of pre-funding their accounts, clients’ assets stay locked in Zodia’s custody. Once a trade is made, the settlement is handled behind the scenes. This “off-venue settlement” model minimizes exposure while keeping things fluid.
One sentence: It’s like having your money in a vault but still being able to shop.
This setup gives institutions the kind of structure they’re used to — and the kind of security they demand.
Institutional Appetite Meets Exchange Anxiety
Big firms want in on crypto — that hasn’t changed. But they’ve been skittish about trusting exchanges, especially after recent failures like FTX and now, Bybit’s own breach.
This new model speaks directly to that concern. It tells institutions: “Yes, you can trade crypto without giving up custody of your assets.”
For large players used to working with regulated custodians in traditional finance, that’s a game-changer.
Let’s break down why that matters:
Concern | Traditional Exchange Model | Zodia-Bybit Model |
---|---|---|
Custody Risk | Funds pooled, often unclear usage | Assets kept separate per client |
Hacker Target | Large, tempting attack surface | Segregated holdings limit damage |
Capital Efficiency | Requires pre-funding | Trade without moving funds upfront |
Institutional Trust | Low | Backed by known financial entities |
Can This Really Prevent the Next Big Hack?
Hard to say.
No system is bulletproof, especially in crypto. But separating trading from custody adds a serious layer of protection. It slows down potential attackers and makes theft harder and more traceable.
Zodia Custody also operates under UK regulatory oversight, giving clients more confidence. And since it doesn’t double as a trading platform, there’s less conflict of interest compared to exchanges holding your funds.
It’s not a silver bullet, but it’s a pretty solid helmet.
Exchanges Under Pressure to Clean Up Their Act
After a string of exchange-related scandals, from FTX’s collapse to KuCoin’s money laundering charges, Bybit’s latest move reflects a broader trend.
Regulators are watching. Investors are wary. And exchanges? They’re being forced to grow up.
Zodia’s CEO Julian Sawyer said the partnership marks a shift “from speculation to infrastructure.” And maybe he’s right.
Even crypto diehards are starting to ask for more accountability.
One sentence here, just to pause: That’s new.
So while this deal is definitely about protecting assets, it’s also about reputation — and trust. Especially after losing $1.45 billion to a rogue state.